Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Adriaan Kooningsstraat 260
Apartment at Adriaan Kooningsstraat 260 in Rotterdam (Oud IJsselmonde neighbourhood). The home was built in 2002 and has 68 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Stadion (496 m). The nearest primary school is De Gouden Griffel (647 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted3 Jul 2026€ 375,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 385,000
Property details
- Living area
- 68 m²
- Construction year
- 2002
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 313,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud IJsselmonde, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.4 km
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated105 persons
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime94.9 per 1,000 residents
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot4,676 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions15 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)71 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical530 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.892 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away17.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 30 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 558 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 255 pupils
Disadvantage score 81 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
no exam results · VWO
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 51 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
68th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.