Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Red Debroystraat 32 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 120 m²139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Kruijffstraat 73 Ridderkerk | € 395.000 € 385.000 | -2.5% | 101 m²168 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hudsonstraat 189
Apartment at Hudsonstraat 189 in Rotterdam (Bospolder neighbourhood). The home was built in 2021 and has 105 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Delfshaven (521 m). The nearest primary school is obs Dakpark (276 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted17 Jul 2026€ 550,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 560,000
Property details
- Living area
- 105 m²
- Construction year
- 2021
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- € 553,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bospolder, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby24
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby15
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside32.2%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors32.7%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot5,745 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions7 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)35 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA++
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical700 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.342 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
16 permits within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
11th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
59th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 149 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
17th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 102 pupils · total 864 pupils
Disadvantage score 156 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 150 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
14th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 163 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
36th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 740 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
65th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 129 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
97th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 108 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.