Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Cor Kieboomplein 237
Apartment at Cor Kieboomplein 237 in Rotterdam (Oud IJsselmonde neighbourhood). The home was built in 2005 and has 104 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Stadion (423 m). The nearest primary school is De Gouden Griffel (468 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted17 Jul 2026€ 439,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 449,000
Property details
- Living area
- 104 m²
- Construction year
- 2005
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 369,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oud IJsselmonde, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.4 km
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- General practitioners within 1 km
- No GP within 1 km0
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated265 persons
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot5,435 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions13 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)66 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical530 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.892 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away17.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 28 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 558 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 151 pupils
Disadvantage score 49 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 328 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 51 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.