Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Red Debroystraat 32 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 120 m²139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Kruijffstraat 73 Ridderkerk | € 395.000 € 385.000 | -2.5% | 101 m²168 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Schonebergerweg 22 C
Apartment at Schonebergerweg 22 in Rotterdam (Nieuwe Westen neighbourhood). The home was built in 1905 and has 95 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Coolhaven (333 m). The nearest primary school is CBS Mozaiek (380 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jul 2026€ 400,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 450,000
Property details
- Living area
- 95 m²
- Construction year
- 1905
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 302,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nieuwe Westen, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby15
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.26 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away22.2 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)26.1 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.4 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)5.9 km
- Distance to railway lineⓘ
- Far from rail1.3 km
- Distance to overhead high-voltage lineⓘ
- Well away4,052 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
35 permits within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
36th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 136 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
40th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 111 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 740 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 56 pupils · total 453 pupils
Disadvantage score 150 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
11th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 69 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
11th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 60 pupils · total 501 pupils
Disadvantage score 166 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
65th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 35 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 103 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · PRO
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 177 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 108 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 53 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.