Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Drinkwaterweg 76
Apartment at Drinkwaterweg 76 in Rotterdam (De Esch neighbourhood). The home was built in 1989 and has 84 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Zuid (891 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool de Esch (346 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted17 Jul 2026€ 389,000−€ 9,000
- Price reduced19 Jun 2026€ 398,000−€ 2,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 400,000
Property details
- Living area
- 84 m²
- Construction year
- 1989
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 409,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 22-09-2085)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in De Esch, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions4,413 kg/m2/yr
- Distance to military terrain
- On/directly adjacent to military site0.3 km
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Very large treatment plant324,000 i.e.
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside36.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,780 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical50 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.817 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away18.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)24.8 km
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Far away (>250 m)284 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
39th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 106 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 268 pupils
Disadvantage score 105 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 82 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 189 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 328 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 90 pupils · total 577 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 320 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
59th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 106 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 180 exam candidates
no exam results · VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.