Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
doctor Hekmanstraat 82
Apartment at doctor Hekmanstraat 82 in Rotterdam (Liskwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 1994 and has 67 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Noord (437 m). The nearest primary school is De Fontein (209 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted17 Jul 2026€ 385,000−€ 13,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 398,000
Property details
- Living area
- 67 m²
- Construction year
- 1994
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 347,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold (leasehold end date: 30-10-2092)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Liskwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport3.4 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors35.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot424 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.133 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away22.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)28.6 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
34 permits within 500 m · 29 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
69th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 125 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 217 pupils
Disadvantage score 62 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 261 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 141 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 317 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 186 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
no exam results · PRO
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 70 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 41 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
33rd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 182 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 224 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
75th percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
8th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.