Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Den Haag, averaging −5.6%. The biggest cut was € 275.000 (Lange Kerkdam 100, Wassenaar). Last updated 16 September.
All houses dropping in price in Den Haag →House prices and market figures in Den Haag →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
Indicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Alberdingk Thijmstraat 156
Apartment at Alberdingk Thijmstraat 156 in 's-Gravenhage (Spoorwijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1929 and has 61 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (503 m). The nearest primary school is De Spoorzoeker (80 m).
asking price€ 425,000
transaction price€ 430,000
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 345,000−€ 14,000
- Off Funda2 Sept 2026
- Price reduced9 Jun 2026€ 359,000−€ 6,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 365,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 40.7% With children+9.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 41.2% Single-person+1.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 18.1% Other multi-person−10.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 34% Owner-occupied−23 pt vs the Netherlands
- 56% Social housing+28 pt vs the Netherlands
- 10% Private rental−4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 20.1% Dutch background−52 pt vs the Netherlands
- 12.7% Rest of Europe+3.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 67.2% Outside Europe+48.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 40.6% Lower+14.6 pt vs the Netherlands
- 40.8% Intermediatesame as the Netherlands
- 18.6% Higher−14.7 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Spoorwijk neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
210 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 33.2% Theft / burglary−5.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 40.7% Other+7.5 pt vs the Netherlands
- 14.1% Violence and threats+4.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 10.1% Vandalism+1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 2% Public order−6.7 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: weak
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
132 permits within 500 m · 112 construction plans within 1 km · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
44th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37: more disadvantage than 77% of schools
7th percentile: low · DIA · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
36th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 296 pupils
Disadvantage score 93: more disadvantage than 97% of schools
29th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 75: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
9th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 79: more disadvantage than 95% of schools
14th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 47: more disadvantage than 83% of schools
23rd percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24: more disadvantage than 64% of schools
38th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52: more disadvantage than 85% of schools
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 89: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
13th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 139: more disadvantage than 100% of schools
26th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
75th percentile: average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
27th percentile: average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
49th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.

