Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Alberdingk Thijmstraat 156
Terraced house at Alberdingk Thijmstraat 156 in 's-Gravenhage (Spoorwijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1929 and has 60 m² of living space, a 93 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (503 m). The nearest primary school is De Spoorzoeker (80 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced9 Jun 2026€ 359,000−€ 6,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 365,000
Property details
- Living area
- 60 m²
- Plot
- 93 m²
- Construction year
- 1929
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 179,000
- Ownership
- Leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Spoorwijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.5%
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive57 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby10
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors44.4%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space76 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)138 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical450 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,454 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,026 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits · 109 construction plans within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
7th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
36th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 296 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 377 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 89 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 139 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.