Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102
Terraced house at Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 in 's-Gravenhage (Archipelbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1999 and has 189 m² of living space, a 156 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Spui (1.5 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool van de Stichting Haagsche School Vereniging (428 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jul 2026€ 1,200,000−€ 50,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 1,250,000
Property details
- Living area
- 189 m²
- Plot
- 156 m²
- Construction year
- 1999
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 1,200,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Archipelbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to business districtⓘ
- Adjacent to business park20 m
- Green share within 500 mⓘ
- Little greenery5%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated85 persons
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure49
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot77 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space81 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)166 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential5,799 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,027 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
47 permits within 500 m · 14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 705 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 220 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 429 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · DOE · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 432 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 285 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 296 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
99th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 236 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
22nd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
61st percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 136 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.