Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Albert Cuypstraat 152 2
Apartment at Albert Cuypstraat 152 in Amsterdam (Sarphatiparkbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1893 and has 167 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is De Pijp (305 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Oscar Carre (207 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jul 2026€ 595,000−€ 54,000
- Listed for sale23 Jun 2026€ 649,000
Property details
- Living area
- 167 m²
- Construction year
- 1893
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 608,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Sarphatiparkbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside39.6%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36.5%
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)142 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical590 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.833 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away8.5 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)6.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
125 permits · 3 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
91st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 214 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
100th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 400 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 325 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 371 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 147 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 17% of schools
86th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
62nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 307 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
100th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 362 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 74 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 100 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 186 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 59 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
15th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 196 exam candidates
43rd percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 129 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.