Price drops in and around Enschede
More homes in and around Enschede whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Annastraat 14
Terraced house at Annastraat 14 in Enschede (Boswinkel-De Braker neighbourhood). The home was built in 1994 and has 92 m² of living space, a 129 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Enschede (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Sint Jan (184 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 319,000−€ 30,000
- Listed for sale6 Jun 2026€ 349,000
Property details
- Living area
- 92 m²
- Plot
- 129 m²
- Construction year
- 1994
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 311,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Boswinkel-De Braker, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Liveability class
- Weakweak
- Liveability score
- clearly below average-0.165 score
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1111 score
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share20.5%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High19.6%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.9%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.9%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- High5.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.6%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High3.7%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.2%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- One within 1 km1
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Nearby (within area of influence)809 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance8%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Multiple sources3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.7 °C
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Below the national average45.6%
- Masts within 300 m
- Multiple transmission masts3
- Share of social assistance recipients
- Elevated6.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot55 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space56 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)167 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,827 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Good yield974 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.3%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
40th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 182 pupils
Disadvantage score 49: more disadvantage than 84% of schools
96th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 192 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 144 pupils
Disadvantage score 63: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
28th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 25: more disadvantage than 66% of schools
4th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 95 pupils
Disadvantage score 40: more disadvantage than 80% of schools
38th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 105 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 107 pupils · total 718 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 14% of schools
90th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 505 pupils
Disadvantage score 39: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
62nd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 235 pupils
Disadvantage score 8: more disadvantage than 36% of schools
45th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 13 pupils · total 107 pupils
Disadvantage score 38: more disadvantage than 78% of schools
59th percentile: average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 86 exam candidates
50th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 162 exam candidates
18th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
46th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 51 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
8th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 152 exam candidates
20th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 215 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.