Price drops in and around Hengelo (OV)
More homes in and around Hengelo (OV) whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Sloetsweg 37
Apartment at Sloetsweg 37 in Hengelo (Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1963 and has 102 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Hengelo Oost (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is IKC Sint Jan (290 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 260,000−€ 19,000
- Listed for sale5 Jun 2026€ 279,000
Property details
- Living area
- 102 m²
- Construction year
- 1963
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 259,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share21.4%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High19.4%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High1.7%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby12
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)18,750 per day
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot154 m above sea level
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions59 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Inefficient (label E)323 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- UneconomicalE
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)956 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.1%
- Noise load
- Heavy63 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Disturbing52 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated2%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated4.8%
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot252 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.9%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.566 µg/m³
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)31.5 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)11.7 km
- Distance to arable crop
- Far away (>250 m)1.1 km
- Distance to sprayed crop
- Far away (>250 m)922 m
- Distance to overhead high-voltage line
- Well away2,107 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
17 zoning plan amendments within 5 km.
Schools
78th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 338 pupils
Disadvantage score 26: more disadvantage than 66% of schools
9th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 65 pupils
Disadvantage score 4: more disadvantage than 24% of schools
4th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 56: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
42nd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 170 pupils
Disadvantage score 27: more disadvantage than 68% of schools
50th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 369 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 379 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 11% of schools
31st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 1% of schools
2nd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 172 pupils
Disadvantage score 1: more disadvantage than 13% of schools
24th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 312 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 53% of schools
34th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 143 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 277 exam candidates
84th percentile: high · 95% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 77 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 120 exam candidates
37th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 57 exam candidates
92nd percentile: high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 185 exam candidates
35th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 242 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.