Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Watertorenweg 577 Rotterdam | € 419.000 € 400.000 | -4.5% | 83 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kemperhof 59 Vlaardingen | € 619.000 € 599.000 | -3.2% | 142 m²126 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Manderhof 15 Bergschenhoek | € 500.000 € 490.000 | -2.0% | 101 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Stationstraat 76 Schiedam | € 350.000 € 345.000 | -1.4% | 86 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Chopinstraat 39 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 890.000 € 850.000 | -4.5% | 142 m²305 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Toermalijn 37 Rhoon | € 1.150.000 € 1.135.000 | -1.3% | 163 m²440 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Plein Eendragt 19 A Schiedam | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 320 m²247 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Stellingmolen 3 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 695.000 € 665.000 | -4.3% | 166 m²229 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
17/07/2026 | doctor Hekmanstraat 82 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 385.000 | -3.3% | 69 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Cor Kieboomplein 237 Rotterdam | € 449.000 € 439.000 | -2.2% | 99 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Floris Burgwal 75 Capelle aan den IJssel | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hudsonstraat 189 Rotterdam | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 110 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Korfoepad 113 Rotterdam | € 575.000 € 563.000 | -2.1% | 126 m²123 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Drinkwaterweg 76 Rotterdam | € 398.000 € 389.000 | -2.3% | 83 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rose-Spoorstraat 16 Rotterdam | € 285.000 € 250.000 | -12.3% | 70 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schonebergerweg 22 C Rotterdam | € 450.000 € 400.000 | -11.1% | 124 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Red Debroystraat 32 Rotterdam | € 475.000 € 449.000 | -5.5% | 120 m²139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schieweg 52 D Rotterdam | € 400.000 € 375.000 | -6.3% | 105 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Frans Bekkerstraat 42 A Rotterdam | € 399.500 € 375.000 | -6.1% | 82 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Kruijffstraat 73 Ridderkerk | € 395.000 € 385.000 | -2.5% | 101 m²168 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Baan 48 M
Home at Baan 48 in Rotterdam (Stadsdriehoek neighbourhood). The home has 140 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Leuvehaven (98 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool Het Landje (138 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted11 Jul 2026€ 1,150,000−€ 45,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 1,195,000
Property details
- Living area
- 140 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- —
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- € 1,022,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Stadsdriehoek, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable1%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Very close (<500 m)159 m
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- very nearby159 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High4%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside29.5%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors34.7%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions12 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space1,549 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)58 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA++
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical60 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential14,034 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low1.123 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
19 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
66th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 85 pupils · total 638 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 355 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 284 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
48th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 405 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
27th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 109 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 210 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
55th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 124 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 66 pupils · total 551 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
98th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 176 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · HAVO/VWO · 36 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VWO
8th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO · 55 exam candidates
21st percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 55 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.