Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Balsemienlaan 230
Apartment at Balsemienlaan 230 in 's-Gravenhage (Bohemen en Meer en Bos neighbourhood). The home was built in 1955 and has 76 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (5.3 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Bohemen Kijkduin (511 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced1 Jul 2026€ 475,000−€ 24,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 499,500
Property details
- Living area
- 76 m²
- Construction year
- 1955
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 455,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bohemen en Meer en Bos, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.2 km
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure13
- Ground subsidence (estimated, mm/year)
- Significant ground subsidence-16.3 mm/yr
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.44 m
- Flood risk class
- High flood risklarge
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot272 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.782 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away44.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)48.4 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)3.2 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)7.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits within 500 m · 13 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 229 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 1673 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 509 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
69th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 420 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
31st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 171 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.