Price drops in and around Almere
More homes in and around Almere whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29/07/2026 | Kronenburgerstraat 14 A Huizen | € 590.000 € 580.000 | -1.7% | 120 m²186 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Citadel 84 Almere | € 489.500 € 455.000 | -7.0% | 106 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Gérard Philipestraat 18 Almere | € 725.000 € 675.000 | -6.9% | 111 m²526 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Bakboord 5 Almere | € 1.195.000 € 1.095.000 | -8.4% | 241 m²458 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Sumatraweg 73 Almere | € 375.000 € 350.000 | -6.7% | 76 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Pieter van Damstraat 42 F Almere | € 310.000 € 299.000 | -3.5% | 59 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zuidwal 17 Huizen | € 379.500 € 372.500 | -1.8% | 77 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Fokkeboom 52 Almere | € 895.000 € 825.000 | -7.8% | 157 m²249 m² | |||
23/07/2026 | Brommy en Tommystraat 17 Almere | € 555.000 € 515.000 | -7.2% | 135 m²166 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Edelhertweg 25 Almere | € 515.000 € 475.000 | -7.8% | 133 m²140 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Azorenweg 37 Almere | € 560.000 € 550.000 | -1.8% | 162 m²152 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Rijksweg 56 Naarden | € 950.000 € 899.000 | -5.4% | 154 m²413 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Mastgatpad 46 Almere | € 429.000 € 425.000 | -0.9% | 104 m²126 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Geerten Gossaertpad 9 Almere | € 475.000 € 460.000 | -3.2% | 110 m²134 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Koetsierbaan 223 Almere | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 129 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Tuinderswerf 1 Almere | € 350.000 € 325.000 | -7.1% | 80 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Nobellaan 45 Almere | € 935.000 € 899.500 | -3.8% | 182 m²195 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Globeplein 38 Almere | € 474.000 € 435.000 | -8.2% | 121 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | William Jamesstraat 25 Almere | € 1.190.000 € 1.169.500 | -1.7% | 197 m²2002 m² | |||
14/07/2026 | De Diagonaal 59 Almere | € 485.000 € 465.000 | -4.1% | 124 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Benny Goodmanstraat 31
Semi-detached at Benny Goodmanstraat 31 in Almere (Muziekwijk N.-Zuidoost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1990 and has 138 m² of living space, a 274 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Almere Muziekwijk (434 m). The nearest primary school is Rooms Katholieke Basisonderwijs Crescendo (349 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted31 Jul 2026€ 549,500−€ 25,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 575,000
Property details
- Living area
- 138 m²
- Plot
- 274 m²
- Construction year
- 1990
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 492,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Muziekwijk N.-Zuidoost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Liveability scoreⓘ
- clearly below average-0.1227 score
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)83%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)82.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Very deep (above 2 m)2.07 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)77 m
- Distance to tram/metro lineⓘ
- Far away12.4 km
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Above-average nuisance6.7%
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Heavy train noise4%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated4.6%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated1.8%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Multiple industrial businesses3
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.4 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Below the national average46.2%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Very spacious plot166 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- High share of renewable energy84%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions6 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space111 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)22 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical0 m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
1 permit within 500 m · 1 zoning plan amendment within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
37th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 277 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 44% of schools
51st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 211 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 18: more disadvantage than 56% of schools
77th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 425 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
53rd percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 417 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
6th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 180 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 53% of schools
36th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 75 pupils · total 562 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
27th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 411 pupils
Disadvantage score 6: more disadvantage than 32% of schools
7th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 155 pupils
Disadvantage score 31: more disadvantage than 73% of schools
no recent test score · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 65: more disadvantage than 91% of schools
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
30th percentile: average · 84% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VWO · 79 exam candidates
38th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 195 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO
20th percentile: low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 241 exam candidates
8th percentile: low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 79 exam candidates
21st percentile: low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 137 exam candidates
6th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 125 exam candidates
7th percentile: low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 325 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.