Price drops in and around Huizen
More homes in and around Huizen whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
29/07/2026 | Godelindeweg 2 Hilversum | € 975.000 € 950.000 | -2.6% | 150 m²955 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Kronenburgerstraat 14 A Huizen | € 590.000 € 580.000 | -1.7% | 120 m²186 m² | |||
29/07/2026 | Godelindeweg 2 Hilversum | € 975.000 € 920.000 | -5.6% | 150 m²955 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Citadel 84 Almere | € 489.500 € 455.000 | -7.0% | 106 m² | |||
28/07/2026 | Gérard Philipestraat 18 Almere | € 725.000 € 675.000 | -6.9% | 111 m²526 m² | |||
27/07/2026 | Silenestraat 6-G18 Hilversum | € 45.000 € 40.000 | -11.1% | — | |||
27/07/2026 | Silenestraat 6-G5 Hilversum | € 41.950 € 39.500 | -5.8% | — | |||
27/07/2026 | Bakboord 5 Almere | € 1.195.000 € 1.095.000 | -8.4% | 241 m²458 m² | |||
24/07/2026 | Zuidwal 17 Huizen | € 379.500 € 372.500 | -1.8% | 77 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Vosmaerlaan 25 Hilversum | € 1.299.000 € 1.199.000 | -7.7% | 184 m²415 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Erfgooiersstraat 589 Hilversum | € 285.000 € 279.000 | -2.1% | 56 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Vaartweg 173 C Hilversum | € 310.000 € 299.000 | -3.5% | 75 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Klaaskampen 19 a Laren (NH) | € 1.349.000 € 1.249.000 | -7.4% | 157 m²310 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Havendijk 17 Bunschoten-Spakenburg | € 499.000 € 485.000 | -2.8% | 93 m²59 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Willem Barentszweg 119 Garagebox 14 Hilversum | € 39.500 € 37.000 | -6.3% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Luitgardeweg 36 Hilversum | € 815.000 € 795.000 | -2.5% | 120 m²218 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Larenseweg 133 Hilversum | € 898.000 € 875.000 | -2.6% | 174 m²212 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Landstraat 213 Bussum | € 820.000 € 800.000 | -2.4% | 152 m²58 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zuiderzeeboulevard 61 Bunschoten-Spakenburg | € 1.175.000 € 1.148.000 | -2.3% | 140 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Rembrandt van Rijnstraat 7 Bunschoten-Spakenburg | € 597.000 € 579.000 | -3.0% | 132 m²195 m² |
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kronenburgerstraat 14 A
Terraced house at Kronenburgerstraat 14 in Huizen (De Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1952 and has 72 m² of living space, a 186 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Naarden-Bussum (5.9 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Van der Brugghenschool (616 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced29 Jul 2026€ 580,000−€ 10,000
- Under offer22 Jul 2026
- Listed for sale13 Jun 2026€ 590,000
Property details
- Living area
- 72 m²
- Plot
- 186 m²
- Construction year
- 1952
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 527,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in De Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away10.2 km
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)88%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure44
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity16
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- Multiple within 1 km2
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High5.4%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High4.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 kmⓘ
- Much industry nearby6
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Number of hazardous installations (REV) within 1 kmⓘ
- Cluster of risky facilities nearby4
- Asbestos-suspected roof areaⓘ
- Large suspected asbestos roof area222 m²
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)ⓘ
- Deep, risk of pile rot254 m above sea level
- Dual designationⓘ
- Cultural-historical valueValue - Cultural heritage
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- moderate share sustainable49%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Above national average€ 520,000
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facilityⓘ
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)806 m
- Distance to nearest external safety facilityⓘ
- Nearby (within area of influence)427 m
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Disturbing51 dB
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Multiple industrial businesses5
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Noticeably warmer1.8 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot80 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Many solar panels45%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space70 m²
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,855 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield987 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values9%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
43 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 10 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
87th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 249 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 324 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 197 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 47% of schools
75th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 187 pupils
Disadvantage score 5: more disadvantage than 29% of schools
no recent test score · total 39 pupils
78th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 216 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
78th percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 201 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 6% of schools
48th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 439 pupils
Disadvantage score 12: more disadvantage than 47% of schools
64th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 0: more disadvantage than 7% of schools
6th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 178 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
41st percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 201 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 241 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
69th percentile: average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 83 exam candidates
64th percentile: average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 106 exam candidates
55th percentile: average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 114 exam candidates
25th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.