Price drops in and around Nijmegen
More homes in and around Nijmegen whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Berg en Dalseweg 5
Terraced house at Berg en Dalseweg 5 in Nijmegen (Hunnerberg neighbourhood). The home was built in 1888 and has 243 m² of living space, a 230 m² plot, 1 bedroom and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Nijmegen (1.3 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool de Buut (383 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted24 Jun 2026€ 160,000−€ 15,000
- Relisted23 Jun 2026€ 175,000+€ 15,000
- Relisted23 Jun 2026€ 160,000−€ 15,000
- Relisted19 Jun 2026€ 175,000+€ 15,000
- Sold (conditional)5 Jun 2026
- Under offer3 Jun 2026€ 160,000
Property details
- Living area
- 243 m²
- Plot
- 230 m²
- Construction year
- 1888
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 159,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hunnerberg, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions105 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)571 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Distance to business district
- Adjacent to business park0 m
- Catering within 300 m
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area22
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated160 persons
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure7
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot142 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average27%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space99 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,861 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield987 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.612 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
100th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 212 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 8% of schools
74th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 449 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 335 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 50% of schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 61 pupils · total 395 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 211 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
61st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 32% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 35 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
62nd percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 135 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
53rd percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 167 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 154 exam candidates
51st percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 262 exam candidates
77th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 352 exam candidates
85th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 117 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
8th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO · 101 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 190 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.