Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22/07/2026 | Marnixstraat 315 D Amsterdam | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 65 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Blasiusstraat 74 D Amsterdam | € 637.500 € 625.000 | -2.0% | 76 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Cornelis Troostplein 3 C Amsterdam | € 475.000 € 440.000 | -7.4% | 46 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Machineweg 290 Aalsmeer | € 2.595.000 € 2.500.000 | -3.7% | 675 m²2965 m² | |||
22/07/2026 | Haarlemmerstraat 3 D Amsterdam | € 475.000 € 450.000 | -5.3% | 53 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kinderdijkstraat 87 1 Amsterdam | € 575.000 € 495.000 | -13.9% | 57 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Bos en Lommerplein 97 Amsterdam | € 635.000 € 599.000 | -5.7% | 96 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Romeinsarmsteeg 5 B Amsterdam | € 750.000 € 699.000 | -6.8% | 103 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Kierkegaardstraat 51 Amstelveen | € 395.000 € 350.000 | -11.4% | 87 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Fritz Conijnstraat 10 3 Amsterdam | € 340.000 € 325.000 | -4.4% | 68 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Rietveld Schröderpad 15 Amsterdam | € 578.500 € 562.500 | -2.8% | 82 m² | |||
21/07/2026 | Achtersteven 24 Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 385.000 | -3.8% | 89 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | In de Poldermolen 7 Duivendrecht | € 375.000 € 350.000 | -6.7% | 58 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Don Boscostraat 465 Amsterdam | € 588.000 € 586.000 | -0.3% | 65 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Herenstraat 25 Weesp | € 860.000 € 840.000 | -2.3% | 135 m²97 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Van der Helstplein 10 1 Amsterdam | € 620.000 € 595.000 | -4.0% | 63 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Binnen Brouwersstraat 44 Amsterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.199.000 | -4.1% | 106 m²23 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Loenermark 384 Amsterdam | € 40.000 € 35.000 | -12.5% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Rode Zee 31 Zaandam | € 450.000 € 375.000 | -16.7% | 125 m²121 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Knokkestraat 65 Amsterdam | € 619.100 € 619.000 | -0.0% | 125 m²62 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Blasiusstraat 74 D
Apartment at Blasiusstraat 74 in Amsterdam (Oosterparkbuurt-Noordwest neighbourhood). The home was built in 1991 and has 92 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Wibautstraat (288 m). The nearest primary school is Aldoende (213 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted22 Jul 2026€ 625,000−€ 12,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 637,500
Property details
- Living area
- 92 m²
- Construction year
- 1991
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 588,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Oosterparkbuurt-Noordwest, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated235 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safetyⓘ
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1679 score
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhoodⓘ
- Predominantly social rental58%
- Green share within 500 mⓘ
- Little greenery5%
- Catering within 300 mⓘ
- Very many catering businesses, nightlife area41
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsⓘ
- High crime127.3 per 1,000 residents
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)84%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.5%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure55
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity10
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance8.9%
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)ⓘ
- Severely disruptive56 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby8
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Environmental health risk (MGR)ⓘ
- High environmental health risk8%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside37.4%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors36.2%
- Dual designationⓘ
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology - 1
- Leasehold or freeholdⓘ
- LeaseholdYes
- Shared plotⓘ
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Few solar panels2%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Above national average€ 575,000
- Distance to military terrainⓘ
- Near military site1.8 km
- Distance to airportⓘ
- Nearby11.4 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)ⓘ
- Elevated10.5 µg/m³
- Noise loadⓘ
- Heavy65 dB
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- Elevated1.5%
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Generous plot315 m²
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)133 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical580 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.639 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away9.4 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)6.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
54 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 317 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 371 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
no recent test score · total 200 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 66% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 140 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 396 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 325 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
67th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 45% of schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 44 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
91st percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 214 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 385 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
58th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 33 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 116 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 100 exam candidates
84th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 154 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 186 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 105 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
18th percentile — low · 88% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 102 exam candidates
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO · 64 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.