Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Bos en Lommerplein 97
Apartment at Bos en Lommerplein 97 in Amsterdam (Robert Scottbuurt-West neighbourhood). The home was built in 2009 and has 95 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is De Vlugtlaan (528 m). The nearest primary school is Enderun Hisar Amsterdam (207 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted21 Jul 2026€ 599,000−€ 36,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 635,000
Property details
- Living area
- 95 m²
- Construction year
- 2009
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 690,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Robert Scottbuurt-West, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes67%
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty11%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated170 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1379 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.1748 score
- Crimes per 1,000 residents
- High crime83.6 per 1,000 residents
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)13%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)76.4%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)74.4%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure26
- Permits <500 m (3 months)
- Very high construction activity8
- Distance to motorway
- Very close56 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.1%
- Noise load
- Loud67 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive58 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby30
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- High environmental health risk8.8%
- Traffic on your own street
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside33.9%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors31.7%
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of homes with solar power
- Few solar panels6%
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Above national average€ 575,000
- Distance to main/through road
- Right on main road56 m
- Distance to airport
- Nearby9.4 km
- Fine dust (PM2.5)
- Elevated10.4 µg/m³
- Road traffic noise
- Considerable noise12.5%
- Odour nuisance from businesses/industry (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated1.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- High heat stress38 °C
- Heat stress class
- High heat stresssterk
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot3,723 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical280 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.661 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
24 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 44 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 245 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
56th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 110 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 62% of schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 414 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.