Price drops in and around Muiden
More homes in and around Muiden whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
22/07/2026 | Erfgooiersstraat 589 Hilversum | € 285.000 € 279.000 | -2.1% | 56 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | In de Poldermolen 7 Duivendrecht | € 375.000 € 350.000 | -6.7% | 58 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Herenstraat 25 Weesp | € 860.000 € 840.000 | -2.3% | 135 m²97 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Loenermark 384 Amsterdam | € 40.000 € 35.000 | -12.5% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Landstraat 213 Bussum | € 820.000 € 800.000 | -2.4% | 152 m²1895 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Fort Ronduitstraat 19 Weesp | € 389.000 € 379.000 | -2.6% | 47 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Cornelis Vermuydenstraat 92 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 65 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Sibogastraat 93 Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 450.000 | -10.0% | 63 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Rijksweg 56 Naarden | € 950.000 € 899.000 | -5.4% | 154 m²413 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Hellingstraat 60 Muiden | € 1.375.000 € 1.250.000 | -9.1% | 146 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Olof Palmeplein 55 Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 395.000 | -1.3% | 76 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leerdamhof 7 Amsterdam | € 450.000 € 375.000 | -16.7% | 74 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Geerten Gossaertpad 9 Almere | € 475.000 € 460.000 | -3.2% | 110 m²134 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Durgerdammerdijk 173 Amsterdam | € 3.800.000 € 3.500.000 | -7.9% | 439 m²12680 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Middenweg 402 Amsterdam | € 675.000 € 625.000 | -7.4% | 95 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Rijksstraatweg 132 Duivendrecht | € 979.000 € 935.000 | -4.5% | 156 m²109 m² | 0 0 1 | ||
16/07/2026 | Groenhoven 144 Amsterdam | € 265.000 € 250.000 | -5.7% | 53 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Havikskruid 133 Diemen | € 385.000 € 345.000 | -10.4% | 61 m² | 0 1 0 | ||
16/07/2026 | Feike de Boerlaan 320 Amsterdam | € 600.000 € 550.000 | -8.3% | 81 m² | |||
15/07/2026 | Linnaeuskade 2 1 Amsterdam | € 1.100.000 € 1.000.000 | -9.1% | 213 m²79 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Burgemeester de Raadtsingel 4
Terraced house at Burgemeester de Raadtsingel 4 in Muiden (Vesting Muiden neighbourhood). The home was built in 1930 and has 125 m² of living space, a 111 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Weesp (2.4 km). The nearest primary school is Jozefschool Muiden (226 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced22 Jul 2026€ 595,000−€ 55,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 650,000
Property details
- Living area
- 125 m²
- Plot
- 111 m²
- Construction year
- 1930
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 607,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Vesting Muiden, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable6%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- High emissions97 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Poor (label F/G)414 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- PoorG
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated95 persons
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Well above national average€ 642,000
- Distance to indoor swimming poolⓘ
- Far away7.2 km
- Children per primary school place (proxy)ⓘ
- Many children per place3.15 ratio
- Supermarkets within 3 kmⓘ
- Hardly any supermarkets0
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)87.7%
- Secondary schools within 3 kmⓘ
- No secondary school within 3 km0
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Severe flight nuisance27.3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)ⓘ
- High3.9%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)ⓘ
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Foundation riskⓘ
- High risklarge
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater26 m above sea level
- Groundwater table (Gt)ⓘ
- Very wet (high groundwater level)IIa
- Distance to tram/metro lineⓘ
- Far away4.8 km
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated4.1%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- Elevated1.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- Elevated1.8%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- High heat stress40 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Multiple industrial businesses4
- Heat stress classⓘ
- High heat stresssterk
- Under flight path / in aviation noise zoneⓘ
- In air traffic noise zoneYes
- PFAS standard breach within 10 kmⓘ
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Below the national average53%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space68 m²
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential4,754 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield994 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values7.9%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.405 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away20.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 13 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 218 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 564 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 551 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
95th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 649 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
83rd percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 347 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
no recent test score · total 191 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
63rd percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 424 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
48th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 334 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 17% of schools
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 282 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
39th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 61 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 76% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.