Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Burgemeester Patijnlaan 488
Apartment at Burgemeester Patijnlaan 488 in 's-Gravenhage (Archipelbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1975 and has 80 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Grote Markt (1.7 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Archipel (527 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 437,700−€ 1,300
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 439,000
Property details
- Living area
- 80 m²
- Construction year
- 1975
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 405,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Archipelbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Traffic on your own streetⓘ
- Very busy (main/motorway)11,250 per day
- Residents in 100m grid cellⓘ
- Very densely populated170 persons
- Permits <500 m (12 months)ⓘ
- Much building pressure28
- Permits <500 m (3 months)ⓘ
- Very high construction activity10
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.27 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)ⓘ
- Very generous plot13,107 m²
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.787 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away42.8 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)48.2 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.6 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)6.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
28 permits within 500 m · 13 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 213 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 705 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 232 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 236 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 401 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 137 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 413 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 215 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 231 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
99th percentile — high · DOE · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 432 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
93rd percentile — high · 91% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 115 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
99th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 7.0 · VWO · 114 exam candidates
22nd percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
5th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.1 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 116 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 69 exam candidates
61st percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 175 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
77th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 87 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.