Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
C.T. Storklaan 583
Apartment at C.T. Storklaan 583 in Rijswijk (Ministerbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 2001 and has 121 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (656 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Steenvoorde (318 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced20 Jul 2026€ 779,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale7 Jun 2026€ 789,000
Property details
- Living area
- 121 m²
- Construction year
- 2001
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 575,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Ministerbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance8.2%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors44.2%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity22
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.3 km
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot5,958 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions11 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)49 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+++
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical650 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.939 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 22 construction plans within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
58th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 335 pupils
Disadvantage score 45 — more disadvantage than 82% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 198 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 722 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 74 pupils · total 488 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 1% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 353 pupils
Disadvantage score 89 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 111 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.