Price drops in and around Leeuwarden
More homes in and around Leeuwarden whose asking price was recently cut.
Save this search and turn on alerts for new price cuts.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the underlying data and figures are indicative and may be incomplete, outdated or incorrect; no rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Camperstraat 31
Terraced house at Camperstraat 31 in Leeuwarden (Zamenhofpark neighbourhood). The home was built in 1933 and has 107 m² of living space, a 85 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Leeuwarden (2 km). The nearest primary school is IKC Franciscus (253 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted30 Jul 2026€ 175,000−€ 10,000
- Sold (conditional)3 Jun 2026€ 185,000
Property details
- Living area
- 107 m²
- Plot
- 85 m²
- Construction year
- 1933
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 203,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Zamenhofpark, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated145 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.119 score
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)21%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.3%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure13
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- Multiple within 1 km9
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Very nearby (within risk contour)294 m
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress47 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby6
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources14
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Building coverage percentage
- Almost completely built up80%
- Dual designation
- Archaeological protectionValue - Archaeology 5
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Elevated emissions61 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Inefficient (label E)335 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- UneconomicalE
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.9%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated5%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- Elevated3.1%
- PFAS standard breach within 10 km
- Limit exceeded within 10 kmYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Noticeably warmer1.2 °C
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space73 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,037 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield991 kWh/kWp/yr
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 282,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values7.2%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.367 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away25.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 8 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
21st percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 289 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
33rd percentile: average · AMN · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 315 pupils
Disadvantage score 103: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
10th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 320 pupils
Disadvantage score 126: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
3rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
99th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 266 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
18th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 212 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
25th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 208 pupils
Disadvantage score 73: more disadvantage than 94% of schools
83rd percentile: high · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 200 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 21: more disadvantage than 60% of schools
70th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 140 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
67th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 31 exam candidates
13th percentile: low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 91 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
82nd percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VWO · 32 exam candidates
42nd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 82 exam candidates
10th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 295 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
67th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 110 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.