Price drops in and around Leeuwarden
More homes in and around Leeuwarden whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Emmakade 57 n
Apartment at Emmakade 57 in Leeuwarden (Molenpad neighbourhood). The home was built in 1942 and has 79 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Leeuwarden (1.1 km). The nearest primary school is IKC De Kinderkoepel (210 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced24 Jul 2026€ 315,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 325,000
Property details
- Living area
- 79 m²
- Construction year
- 1942
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 179,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Molenpad, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of households lowest 40% income
- strong concentration of low incomes69.5%
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1421 score
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)19%
- Satisfied with the property (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.5%
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)80.5%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure10
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- Multiple within 1 km12
- Distance to nearest external safety facility
- Very nearby (within risk contour)79 m
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Industrial emitters within 2 km
- Much industry nearby11
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside43%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.7%
- Number of risk sources within 1 km
- Many sources22
- Foundation risk
- High risklarge
- Shared plot
- Shared plotYes
- Share of renewable energy
- moderate share sustainable47%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Nearby (0.5-1 km)709 m
- Distance to nearest emission source
- nearby448 m
- Distance to nearest transmission mast
- Transmission mast nearby (<100 m)25 m
- Distance to railway line
- Close to railway229 m
- Distance to glasshouse horticulture area
- Greenhouses nearby778 m
- Capacity nearest WWTP
- Large treatment plant153,000 i.e.
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Above-average nuisance7.8%
- Odour nuisance from wood burning (% seriously affected)
- Elevated5%
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,234 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions8 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)46 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+++
- Average WOZ value (municipality)
- Far below national average€ 282,000
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values7.2%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.375 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away25.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)36.1 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)2.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits · 13 construction plans within 500 m · 8 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
19th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 184 pupils
Disadvantage score 55: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
33rd percentile: average · AMN · grade 8: 6 pupils · total 315 pupils
Disadvantage score 103: more disadvantage than 98% of schools
18th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 212 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 452 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 142 pupils
Disadvantage score 58: more disadvantage than 89% of schools
21st percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 289 pupils
Disadvantage score 86: more disadvantage than 96% of schools
5th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 129 pupils
Disadvantage score 16: more disadvantage than 54% of schools
99th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 266 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
55th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 210 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile: low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 320 pupils
Disadvantage score 126: more disadvantage than 99% of schools
10th percentile: low · 82% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 295 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
67th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 110 exam candidates
82nd percentile: high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VWO · 32 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
14th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VWO · 70 exam candidates
67th percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 31 exam candidates
70th percentile: average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 140 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
42nd percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 82 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.