Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Claude Debussystraat 45
Terraced house at Claude Debussystraat 45 in 's-Gravenhage (Nieuw Waldeck neighbourhood). The home was built in 1981 and has 85 m² of living space, 1 bedroom and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (4.4 km). The nearest primary school is Het Lichtbaken (236 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted2 Jul 2026€ 350,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 85 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 1981
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 1
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 365,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Nieuw Waldeck, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Share of social rental housing in the neighbourhood
- Predominantly social rental66%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.7 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated130 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place1.97 ratio
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot940 m²
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space76 m²
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,513 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,042 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.836 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
22 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 509 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
19th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.