Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | De Genestetlaan 256 Den Haag | € 387.500 € 375.000 | -3.2% | 135 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hammarskjöldlaan 467 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 15.000 € 13.500 | -10.0% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Agrippinastraat 17 Voorburg | € 695.000 € 669.000 | -3.7% | 109 m²106 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | C.T. Storklaan 583 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 789.000 € 779.000 | -1.3% | 120 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Kapellaan 28 Den Hoorn (ZH) | € 498.000 € 485.000 | -2.6% | 100 m²95 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Stoeplaan 11 F24 Wassenaar | € 875.000 € 840.000 | -4.0% | 150 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
De Genestetlaan 256
Apartment at De Genestetlaan 256 in 's-Gravenhage (Laakkwartier-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1938 and has 135 m² of living space, 5 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (1 km). The nearest primary school is Obs Dr Willem Drees (395 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted20 Jul 2026€ 375,000−€ 12,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 387,500
Property details
- Living area
- 135 m²
- Construction year
- 1938
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 400,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Laakkwartier-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance10%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby9
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside36.8%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors33.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.889 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away39.1 km
- Distance to biomass plantⓘ
- At distance (>3 km)44.5 km
- Distance to nearest emission sourceⓘ
- ample distance1.7 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbineⓘ
- Far away (>2 km)4.6 km
- Distance to nearest transmission mastⓘ
- No transmitter mast in the neighbourhood334 m
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
29 permits within 500 m · 35 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 51 pupils · total 378 pupils
Disadvantage score 79 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
36th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 307 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
2nd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 607 pupils
Disadvantage score 125 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
7th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
20th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 297 pupils
Disadvantage score 74 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 234 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
24th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 190 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.