Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dennekruid 210
Terraced house at Dennekruid 210 in Rotterdam (Ommoord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 140 m² of living space, a 156 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Graskruid (570 m). The nearest primary school is De Horizon (208 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced11 Jun 2026€ 470,000−€ 30,000
- Price reduced10 Jun 2026€ 500,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 525,000
Property details
- Living area
- 140 m²
- Plot
- 156 m²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 495,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Ommoord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)363 m
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island1.9 °C
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away8.9 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated105 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot86 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions0 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space72 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical570 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential5,075 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,001 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
11 permits within 500 m · 12 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 247 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 47% of schools
5th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 195 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
63rd percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 145 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 206 pupils
Disadvantage score 72 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 194 pupils
Disadvantage score 29 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 340 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
90th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 475 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
64th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 383 pupils
Disadvantage score 3 — more disadvantage than 20% of schools
40th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
88th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 84 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 303 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 130 exam candidates
16th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 216 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO · 56 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO
no exam results · PRO
13th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 192 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 84 exam candidates
46th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO · 95 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.