Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Dijkgraafplein 311
Apartment at Dijkgraafplein 311 in Amsterdam (Dijkgraafpleinbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1972 and has 100 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Lelylaan (3.3 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool De Punt (55 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer11 Jul 2026
- Relisted7 Jul 2026€ 369,000−€ 6,000
- Listed for sale19 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 100 m²
- Construction year
- 1972
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 375,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Dijkgraafpleinbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress42 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 km
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)79,640 m²
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside41.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors40.1%
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot6,515 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)179 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical420 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.764 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away5.1 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 333 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
34th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 422 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 418 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
41st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 314 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 425 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.