Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Donkerslootstraat 143 B
Home at Donkerslootstraat 143 in Rotterdam (Hillesluis neighbourhood). The home was built in 1940 and has 93 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Rotterdam Stadion (352 m). The nearest primary school is Risala (325 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced26 Jun 2026€ 290,000−€ 10,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 300,000
Property details
- Living area
- 93 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 1940
- Property type
- Home
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 264,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Hillesluis, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby16
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside30.6%
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot312 m²
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space68 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,839 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,014 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.906 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away17.3 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)22.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 558 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
35th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
53rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 183 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
94th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 192 pupils
Disadvantage score 81 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
30th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 234 pupils
Disadvantage score 93 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
18th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 23 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 73 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
27th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 10 pupils · total 104 pupils
Disadvantage score 12 — more disadvantage than 46% of schools
73rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 270 pupils
Disadvantage score 103 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 159 pupils
Disadvantage score 61 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
no exam results · VWO
68th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 51 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
10th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 101 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
95th percentile — high · 97% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VWO · 76 exam candidates
68th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 327 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.