Price drops in and around Dordrecht
More homes in and around Dordrecht whose asking price was recently cut.
Over the past 30 days we tracked 60 price cuts in and around Dordrecht, averaging −4.6%. The biggest cut was € 150.000 (Rotterdamseweg 144, Zwijndrecht). Last updated 16 September.
All houses dropping in price in Dordrecht →House prices and market figures in Dordrecht →
The listing read like a buyer’s agent: strengths, question marks, clauses.
Our own valuation with a range beside the asking price. And: overbid or not?
Scores for family, quiet, greenery and getting around, per address.
What the condition means for costs and your bid, your impression weighed in.
How good the schools are, and shops and transit in actual metres.
From the foundation to building plans: the risks around the home, lined up.
Comparable sales, time on market and your room to negotiate.
A verdict on the purchase, and what to check and ask before you bid.
For sale-6.9%
For sale-4.1%
For sale-4.5%
For sale-3.9%
For sale-3.1%
For sale-3.2%
For sale-5.3%
For sale-4.8%
For sale-3.4%
For sale-3.0%
For sale-3.7%
For sale-1.7%
For sale-8.5%
For sale-3.2%
For sale-3.3%
For sale-3.6%
For sale-4.5%
For sale-7.6%
For sale-5.7%
For sale-10.0%
For sale-6.6%
For sale-2.0%
For sale-3.9%
Huisverklikker Chrome extensionIndicative data, possibly incomplete or incorrect. Not advice, no rights can be derived from it. Always do your own research.
Dubbeldamseweg Zuid 134
Terraced house at Dubbeldamseweg Zuid 134 in Dordrecht (Bloemenbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1913 and has 97 m² of living space, a 102 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Dordrecht (642 m). The nearest primary school is Dordtse Vrijeschool (397 m).
WOZ value over the years
Fetching WOZ history…
Price & status history
- Relistedtoday€ 339,000−€ 11,000
- Off Fundayesterday
- Relisted10 Jul 2026€ 350,000−€ 19,000
- Listed for sale17 Jun 2026€ 369,000
At a glance
Click a card for the explanation and source.
- 32.6% With children+1.1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 41.3% Single-person+1.2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 26.1% Other multi-person−2.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 56% Owner-occupied−1 pt vs the Netherlands
- 28% Social housingsame as the Netherlands
- 16% Private rental+2 pt vs the Netherlands
- 59.8% Dutch background−12.3 pt vs the Netherlands
- 21.7% Rest of Europe+12.4 pt vs the Netherlands
- 17.4% Outside Europe−1.1 pt vs the Netherlands
Share of adults in the neighbourhood who are (very) satisfied, RIVM Health Monitor 2024. The bar lines the neighbourhood up against all 11,734 neighbourhoods with a figure in the monitor: half of them sit between 87 and 93 percent, so a few points move a neighbourhood from the middle to the tail. "Not (very) satisfied" is neutral and dissatisfied together, because the monitor does not publish those two separately. A neighbourhood average, so it says nothing about this particular home.
Shares in the Bloemenbuurt neighbourhood, source CBS. Each share is rounded on its own, so the total can land just off 100.
25 reports in the neighbourhood over the latest full year
- 8.3% Theft / burglary−30.7 pt vs the Netherlands
- 50% Other+16.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 20.8% Violence and threats+10.8 pt vs the Netherlands
- 8.3% Vandalismsame as the Netherlands
- 12.5% Public order+3.8 pt vs the Netherlands
Source Police/CBS, neighbourhood level, latest full calendar year. Only crimes reported to the police; willingness to report differs by offence and by area. A neighbourhood with shops or nightlife counts visitors’ reports too, so busy does not automatically mean unsafe.
Liveability class: more than sufficient
Leefbaarometer 3.0 (Dutch Ministry of the Interior / RIGO), 2024 edition. The scale is by definition a deviation from the national average: 0 IS the Netherlands, and that is the tick on the bar. The bar itself is the place among all neighbourhoods, because they do not sit symmetrically around zero: the same small minus is mid-pack on one sub-scale and the tail on another. A model score for the whole neighbourhood, not a measurement at this address. Resident mix stays grey: a different population is not better or worse, only different.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods. The national figure comes from the same table and the same formula, so the comparison is between places rather than between definitions.
RIVM Health Monitor Adults and Elderly (CBS 50090NED), adults aged 18 and over. Neighbourhood averages from a sample survey with statistical uncertainty: a character sketch of the area, not a statement about whoever lives in this house.
CBS key figures for districts and neighbourhoods.
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
60 permits within 500 m · 57 construction plans within 1 km · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Features
Stations
Schools
85th percentile: high · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 331 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
66th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 42 pupils · total 306 pupils
Disadvantage score 11: more disadvantage than 45% of schools
37th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 206 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
71st percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 321 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 222 pupils
Disadvantage score 61: more disadvantage than 90% of schools
76th percentile: high · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 368 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
69th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 218 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
43rd percentile: average · IEP · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 57: more disadvantage than 88% of schools
70th percentile: average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 202 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
10th percentile: low · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 54: more disadvantage than 87% of schools
97th percentile: high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 83 exam candidates
15th percentile: low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VWO · 84 exam candidates
65th percentile: average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 69 exam candidates
53rd percentile: average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO · 67 exam candidates
26th percentile: average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 177 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
50th percentile: average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 210 exam candidates
45th percentile: average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 172 exam candidates
5th percentile: low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.2 · HAVO/VWO · 86 exam candidates
25th percentile: average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 151 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.