Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Duinslag 71
Semi-detached at Duinslag 71 in 's-Gravenhage (Ockenburgh neighbourhood). The home was built in 2023 and has 151 m² of living space, a 120 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A+++. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (5.8 km). The nearest primary school is De Kleine Keizer (673 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted6 Jul 2026€ 739,500−€ 10,500
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 750,000
Property details
- Living area
- 151 m²
- Plot
- 120 m²
- Construction year
- 2023
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A+++
- WOZ value
- € 655,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Ockenburgh, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away8.4 km
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsⓘ
- High crime132.3 per 1,000 residents
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.81 m
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Spacious plot53 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- High share of renewable energy72%
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average35%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions7 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space77 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)29 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA+++
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 13 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 438 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 509 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
99th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 229 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.3 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 225 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.