Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Eastonstraat 135
Apartment at Eastonstraat 135 in Amsterdam (Osdorp-Zuidoost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1963 and has 76 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Lelylaan (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is Louis Bouwmeesterschool (457 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted7 Jul 2026€ 375,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale5 Jun 2026€ 395,000
Property details
- Living area
- 76 m²
- Construction year
- 1963
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 413,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property burdened with leasehold (leasehold expiry date: 15-07-2036)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Osdorp-Zuidoost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.1%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.1%
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.7 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated180 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1229 score
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)3%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)187 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical750 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.695 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away5.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)5.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
12 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 8% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
44th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 352 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
51st percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 231 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.