Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Fagelstraat 94 3
Apartment at Fagelstraat 94 in Amsterdam (Frederik Hendrikbuurt-Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1904 and has 46 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Rokin (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Bron (248 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced17 Jun 2026€ 695,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 710,000
Property details
- Living area
- 46 m²
- Construction year
- 1904
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 831,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property subject to leasehold (leasehold end date: 15-07-2028)
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Frederik Hendrikbuurt-Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby22
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.3 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors36%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)149 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical630 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.63 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)3.2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
64 permits within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
15th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 113 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 152 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 0% of schools
79th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 407 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
68th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 25 — more disadvantage than 65% of schools
71st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 346 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 216 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 359 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 348 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 111 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
43rd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO · 35 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 59 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 362 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.