Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Fanny Blankers-Koenlaan 20
Terraced house at Fanny Blankers-Koenlaan 20 in Amsterdam (Laan van Spartaan neighbourhood). The home was built in 2013 and has 138 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (358 m). The nearest primary school is Bos en Lommerschool (476 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced6 Jun 2026€ 865,000−€ 35,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 900,000
Property details
- Living area
- 138 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 2013
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 880,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Laan van Spartaan, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Serious noise nuisance from trains (neighbourhood)
- Strong rail nuisance4.8%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby29
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.2%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42.7%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated95 persons
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot6,429 m²
- Share of renewable energy
- High share of renewable energy77%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions7 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space46 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)20 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical0 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,205 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
5 permits within 500 m · 43 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 295 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
no recent test score · total 38 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 363 pupils
Disadvantage score 43 — more disadvantage than 81% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 245 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
51st percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 41 — more disadvantage than 80% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.