Price drops in and around Leidschendam
More homes in and around Leidschendam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Filmlaan 1 Zoetermeer | € 485.000 € 475.000 | -2.1% | 115 m²129 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Breestraat 123 B Leiden | € 699.000 € 625.000 | -10.6% | 109 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Schuitwater 17 Zoetermeer | € 475.000 € 469.000 | -1.3% | 132 m²153 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Fuutlaan 12
Semi-detached at Fuutlaan 12 in Leidschendam (Park Veursehout neighbourhood). The home was built in 1998 and has 212 m² of living space, a 289 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label A++. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Mariahoeve (640 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare Basisschool de Margriet (631 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted10 Jul 2026€ 1,365,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 1,385,000
Property details
- Living area
- 212 m²
- Plot
- 289 m²
- Construction year
- 1998
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- A++
- WOZ value
- € 1,115,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Park Veursehout, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away5.2 km
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0
- Net labour participationⓘ
- Low60%
- Average highest groundwater level (GHG)ⓘ
- Very high groundwater27 m above sea level
- Flood risk classⓘ
- High flood risklarge
- Dual designationⓘ
- Archaeological protectionValue – Archaeology 4
- Average WOZ value (municipality)ⓘ
- Above national average€ 480,000
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Very spacious plot173 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average29%
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- Low emissions14 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space156 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)72 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA++
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Very high potential11,185 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 14 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
99th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 11 pupils · total 173 pupils
Disadvantage score 53 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
78th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 258 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 196 pupils
Disadvantage score 56 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 274 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
9th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 171 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 455 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 207 pupils
Disadvantage score 66 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 221 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
54th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 214 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 25% of schools
23rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 218 pupils
Disadvantage score 13 — more disadvantage than 49% of schools
93rd percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 50 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 69 exam candidates
60th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 123 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 79 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
95th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VBO/MAVO · 71 exam candidates
71st percentile — average · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 84 exam candidates
23rd percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 187 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 59 exam candidates
48th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 110 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.