Price drops in and around Rijswijk (ZH)
More homes in and around Rijswijk (ZH) whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Generaal Spoorlaan 479
Apartment at Generaal Spoorlaan 479 in Rijswijk (Te Werve neighbourhood). The home was built in 1958 and has 75 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label E. The nearest railway station is Rijswijk (526 m). The nearest primary school is Basisschool De Piramide (203 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer18 Jul 2026
- Relisted3 Jul 2026€ 350,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale6 Jun 2026€ 365,000
Property details
- Living area
- 75 m²
- Construction year
- 1958
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- E
- WOZ value
- € 304,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Te Werve, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.5%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby11
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors42%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby5
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated175 persons
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share21%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot402 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical620 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values10.6%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.939 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away38.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)43.1 km
- Distance to nearest emission source
- ample distance2 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
4 permits within 500 m · 36 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
38th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 139 pupils
Disadvantage score 4 — more disadvantage than 24% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 323 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 424 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
80th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 53 pupils · total 432 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 59% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 154 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
58th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 68 — more disadvantage than 92% of schools
23rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 165 pupils
Disadvantage score 24 — more disadvantage than 64% of schools
7th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 311 pupils
Disadvantage score 76 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/PRO
7th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 115 exam candidates
26th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 81 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 161 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 27 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
49th percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO · 100 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
44th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 227 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.