Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Groenhoven 163
Apartment at Groenhoven 163 in Amsterdam (G-buurt-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1975 and has 104 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label G. The nearest railway station is Ganzenhoef (306 m). The nearest primary school is Openbare basisschool Wereldwijs (306 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jun 2026€ 350,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 375,000
Property details
- Living area
- 104 m²
- Construction year
- 1975
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- G
- WOZ value
- € 401,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in G-buurt-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions83 kg/m2/yr
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Poor (label F/G)453 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- PoorG
- Serious noise nuisance from aircraft (neighbourhood)
- Severe flight nuisance24.2%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated225 persons
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)19%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,130 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical660 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.572 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away15.1 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)12.4 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)2.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 23 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 454 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 62 pupils · total 511 pupils
Disadvantage score 168 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
52nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 88 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 114 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
44th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 384 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 35% of schools
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 55 pupils · total 439 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
4th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
25th percentile — low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 76% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
6th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 72% passed · CE avg 5.9 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 158 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.