Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
H.M. Kraaijvangerstraat 21
Terraced house at H.M. Kraaijvangerstraat 21 in Amsterdam (Noordoever Sloterplas neighbourhood). The home was built in 2017 and has 142 m² of living space, a 93 m² plot, 5 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (924 m). The nearest primary school is Oecumenische basisschool Pro Rege Noorderhof (366 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)2 Jul 2026
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 990,000−€ 60,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 1,050,000
Property details
- Living area
- 142 m²
- Plot
- 93 m²
- Construction year
- 2017
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 5
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 909,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Noordoever Sloterplas, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions4,015 kg/m2/yr
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby28
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside40.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors38.7%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated180 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1032 score
- Livability Meter: housing stock
- Clearly below average-0.15 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space55 m²
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical400 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential3,866 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits within 500 m · 40 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
2nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 199 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
70th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 52 pupils · total 464 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
40th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 452 pupils
Disadvantage score 117 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 122 pupils
Disadvantage score 36 — more disadvantage than 76% of schools
29th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
58th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 93 pupils · total 591 pupils
Disadvantage score 63 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
60th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 22 — more disadvantage than 61% of schools
16th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 32 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 70 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
7th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 174 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 72% of schools
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 61% passed · CE avg 5.5 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 89 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.