Price drops in and around Rotterdam
More homes in and around Rotterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Hellevoetstraat 67
Apartment at Hellevoetstraat 67 in Rotterdam (Tarwewijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1963 and has 52 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Maashaven (605 m). The nearest primary school is Globe (167 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted8 Jul 2026€ 250,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 270,000
Property details
- Living area
- 52 m²
- Construction year
- 1963
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 211,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Tarwewijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)420 m
- Distance to nearest emission source
- very nearby168 m
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10.6%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High3%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High4%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress45 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby17
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,837 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)170 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values9.4%
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low1.008 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away19.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)23.7 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)4 km
- Distance to railway line
- Far from rail1.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
7 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 33 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 101 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 39 pupils · total 281 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 404 pupils
Disadvantage score 116 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
54th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 63 pupils · total 529 pupils
Disadvantage score 19 — more disadvantage than 58% of schools
52nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 210 pupils
Disadvantage score 39 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
51st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 231 pupils
Disadvantage score 86 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
26th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 351 pupils
Disadvantage score 91 — more disadvantage than 97% of schools
73rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 22 pupils · total 81 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
no recent test score · total 65 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 38% of schools
61st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 205 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
31st percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 95 exam candidates
62nd percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
87th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 87 exam candidates
9th percentile — low · 83% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 163 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 148 exam candidates
no exam results · BRUGJAAR
47th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 146 exam candidates
81st percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 132 exam candidates
12th percentile — low · 85% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
98th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VBO/MAVO · 92 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.