Price drops in and around Hilversum
More homes in and around Hilversum whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Herman Broekhuizenstraat 8
Detached at Herman Broekhuizenstraat 8 in Hilversum (Anna's Hoeve neighbourhood). The home was built in 2017 and has 259 m² of living space, a 391 m² plot, 7 bedrooms and energy label A+. The nearest railway station is Hilversum Sportpark (1.4 km). The nearest primary school is Villa Vrolik (146 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted9 Jun 2026€ 1,750,000−€ 45,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 1,795,000
Property details
- Living area
- 259 m²
- Plot
- 391 m²
- Construction year
- 2017
- Property type
- Detached
- Bedrooms
- 7
- Energy label
- A+
- WOZ value
- € 1,393,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Anna's Hoeve, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable18%
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Very close (<500 m)392 m
- Distance to nearest emission source
- very nearby144 m
- Distance to nearest RWZI
- Very close267 m
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated95 persons
- Average lowest groundwater level (GLG)
- Deep, risk of pile rot254 m above sea level
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Very spacious plot260 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Many solar panels66%
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- Low emissions17 kg/m2/yr
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space201 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)99 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA+
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical400 m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
2 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 18 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
49th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 368 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
33rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 12 pupils · total 207 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
48th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 14 pupils · total 158 pupils
Disadvantage score 32 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
82nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 403 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 12% of schools
57th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 393 pupils
Disadvantage score 9 — more disadvantage than 40% of schools
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 361 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
27th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 785 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
92nd percentile — high · DIA · grade 8: 29 pupils · total 464 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 31 pupils · total 241 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 140 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
83rd percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO · 74 exam candidates
93rd percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 28 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 55 exam candidates
28th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 31 exam candidates
45th percentile — average · 91% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 264 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
79th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 105 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.