Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Iwan Kantemanplein 28
Terraced house at Iwan Kantemanplein 28 in Amsterdam (De Aker-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1999 and has 140 m² of living space, a 139 m² plot, 3 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Heemstedestraat (3.1 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare Daltonbasisschool De Horizon (93 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted2 Jul 2026€ 827,000−€ 18,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 845,000
Property details
- Living area
- 140 m²
- Plot
- 139 m²
- Construction year
- 1999
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 744,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in De Aker-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Distance to nearest glasshouse horticulture
- Very close104 m
- Distance to airport
- Directly next to airport5 km
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress48 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away7.4 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated155 persons
- Liveability Meter: nuisance and safety
- Much more nuisance/unsafety than average-0.1059 score
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plot
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot area
- Spacious plot64 m²
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average26%
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space71 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)144 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical750 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Strong potential4,982 kWh/yr
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 21 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 422 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 425 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 333 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
10th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 88% of schools
11th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 232 pupils
Disadvantage score 54 — more disadvantage than 87% of schools
34th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
64th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 50% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
50th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 67 pupils · total 418 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 231 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · PRO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.