Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jacob Marisstraat 93
Apartment at Jacob Marisstraat 93 in 's-Gravenhage (Schildersbuurt-Oost neighbourhood). The home was built in 1903 and has 73 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Den Haag HS (1 km). The nearest primary school is Startpunt International (101 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted16 Jul 2026€ 325,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale24 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 73 m²
- Construction year
- 1903
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- € 285,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Schildersbuurt-Oost, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable19%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance10.4%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)ⓘ
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effectⓘ
- Strong heat island2.4 °C
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside39.5%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Plan statusⓘ
- Finalfinal
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)157 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical740 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.897 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facilityⓘ
- Far away40.3 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
13 permits within 500 m · 34 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
7th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 193 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 317 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 263 pupils
Disadvantage score 78 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
92nd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 327 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 308 pupils
Disadvantage score 50 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
20th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 265 pupils
Disadvantage score 98 — more disadvantage than 98% of schools
26th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 169 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
27th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 70 pupils · total 633 pupils
Disadvantage score 208 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
31st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 175 pupils
Disadvantage score 51 — more disadvantage than 85% of schools
74th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO · 76 exam candidates
75th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/PRO · 12 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
no exam results · PRO
0th percentile — low · 57% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 221 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
90th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.6 · HAVO/VWO · 6 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.