Price drops in and around Hilversum
More homes in and around Hilversum whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jacob van Campenlaan 12
Apartment at Jacob van Campenlaan 12 in Hilversum (Noord neighbourhood). The home was built in 1952 and has 59 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Hilversum Media Park (882 m). The nearest primary school is De Wilge (347 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)7 Jul 2026
- Under offer12 Jun 2026
- Relisted7 Jun 2026€ 349,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 369,000
Property details
- Living area
- 59 m²
- Construction year
- 1952
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 325,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Noord, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.3%
- Odour nuisance fireplace/BBQ (% seriously annoyed)
- High4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.1%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress43 °C
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside44.7%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors43%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated120 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place5.16 ratio
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot5,374 m²
- Plan status
- Finalfinal
- Share of homes with solar power
- Above average31%
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical730 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values7.1%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.45 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away32.4 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
24 permits · 4 construction plans within 500 m · 26 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
27th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 19 pupils · total 785 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 5 pupils · total 73 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
62nd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 140 pupils
Disadvantage score 11 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
43rd percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 7 pupils · total 93 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
13th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 17 pupils · total 114 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
45th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 361 pupils
Disadvantage score 31 — more disadvantage than 73% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 101 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
89th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 344 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
82nd percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 403 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 12% of schools
62nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
79th percentile — high · 99% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 105 exam candidates
33rd percentile — average · 89% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 55 exam candidates
97th percentile — high · 100% passed · CE avg 6.8 · VBO/MAVO · 31 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
28th percentile — average · 88% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 106 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
17th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.3 · HAVO/VWO · 112 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
75th percentile — average · 92% passed · CE avg 6.7 · VWO · 129 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.