Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jan Evertsenstraat 1 4
Apartment at Jan Evertsenstraat 1 in Amsterdam (Kortenaerkwartier neighbourhood). The home was built in 1912 and has 110 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label A. The nearest railway station is Jan van Galenstraat (1.6 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool Al Maes (129 m).
Price & status history
- Under offer19 Jun 2026
- Relisted10 Jun 2026€ 675,000−€ 95,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 770,000
Property details
- Living area
- 110 m²
- Construction year
- 1912
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- A
- WOZ value
- —
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Kortenaerkwartier, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9.2%
- Noise load
- Loud68 dB
- Road traffic noise exposure (Lnight)
- Severely disruptive59 dB
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby23
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Environmental health risk (MGR)
- High environmental health risk7.9%
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)147 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalA
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical700 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.661 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away5.6 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)3.9 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
72 permits · 1 construction plan within 500 m · 48 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
66th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 391 pupils
Disadvantage score 47 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
86th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 34 pupils · total 286 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
75th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 24 pupils · total 272 pupils
Disadvantage score 15 — more disadvantage than 52% of schools
94th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 435 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
37th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 226 pupils
Disadvantage score 27 — more disadvantage than 68% of schools
13th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 33 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 60 — more disadvantage than 90% of schools
91st percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 36 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 5 — more disadvantage than 28% of schools
72nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 318 pupils
Disadvantage score 7 — more disadvantage than 33% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 351 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
56th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 40 pupils · total 266 pupils
Disadvantage score 30 — more disadvantage than 71% of schools
10th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 94 exam candidates
18th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 67% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 102 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
0th percentile — low · 52% passed · CE avg 5.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 33 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.