Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Jodenbreestraat 116
Apartment at Jodenbreestraat 116 in Amsterdam (Waterloopleinbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1966 and has 71 m² of living space, 2 bedrooms and energy label C. The nearest railway station is Waterlooplein (160 m). The nearest primary school is De Witte Olifant (199 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted23 Jun 2026€ 575,000−€ 25,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 600,000
Property details
- Living area
- 71 m²
- Construction year
- 1966
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- C
- WOZ value
- € 624,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Waterloopleinbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance9%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby14
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Urban heat island effect
- Strong heat island2.1 °C
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside35.5%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors34%
- Masts within 300 m
- Many transmission masts nearby6
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Generous plot366 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical700 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.671 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away8.2 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)5.3 km
- Distance to nearest wind turbine
- Far away (>2 km)5.5 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
60 permits · 2 construction plans within 500 m · 50 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
76th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 319 pupils
Disadvantage score 0 — more disadvantage than 3% of schools
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 49 pupils · total 396 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
85th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 325 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
100th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 400 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
47th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 317 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 56% of schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 17 — more disadvantage than 55% of schools
89th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 359 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
96th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 50 pupils · total 348 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
15th percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 150 pupils
Disadvantage score 37 — more disadvantage than 77% of schools
84th percentile — high · IEP · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 371 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
84th percentile — high · 96% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 154 exam candidates
91st percentile — high · 92% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 109 exam candidates
58th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 33 exam candidates
19th percentile — low · 89% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 70 exam candidates
92nd percentile — high · 93% passed · CE avg 6.9 · VWO · 116 exam candidates
27th percentile — average · 86% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 100 exam candidates
29th percentile — average · 85% passed · CE avg 6.5 · HAVO/VWO · 130 exam candidates
7th percentile — low · 80% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 362 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
4th percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO · 64 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.