Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Leuvensestraat 79 A Den Haag | € 789.000 € 749.000 | -5.1% | 110 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Prinses Mariannelaan 288 A Voorburg | € 500.000 € 489.000 | -2.2% | 137 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Hollanderstraat 36 Den Haag | € 775.000 € 715.000 | -7.7% | 122 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Zeekant 94 G Den Haag | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 72 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | van Halewijnlaan 4 A Voorburg | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Else Mauhslaan 137 Den Haag | € 625.000 € 610.000 | -2.4% | 143 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Tulpstraat 20 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 275.000 € 250.000 | -9.1% | 54 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Van Lennepweg 50 Den Haag | € 850.000 € 797.500 | -6.2% | 170 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Margarethaland 269 Den Haag | € 385.000 € 362.500 | -5.8% | 87 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Dr H. Colijnlaan 6 F102 Rijswijk (ZH) | € 295.000 € 240.000 | -18.6% | 96 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Klimopstraat 77 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 550.000 | -7.6% | 111 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Windjammersingel 34 Den Haag | € 595.000 € 575.000 | -3.4% | 154 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leidsekade 42 Leidschendam | € 1.000.000 € 998.000 | -0.2% | 138 m²130 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Overgauwseweg 75 Pijnacker | € 1.200.000 € 1.075.000 | -10.4% | 170 m²1325 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Molslaan 78 Delft | € 320.000 € 300.000 | -6.3% | 59 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Pyrolalaan 96 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.185.000 | -5.2% | 153 m²230 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Zwolsestraat 219 Den Haag | € 524.000 € 495.000 | -5.5% | 139 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Burgemeester Marijnenlaan 102 Den Haag | € 1.250.000 € 1.200.000 | -4.0% | 157 m²156 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Van Zeggelenlaan 12 Den Haag | € 300.000 € 299.000 | -0.3% | 85 m² | |||
16/07/2026 | Korenlaan 3 Wassenaar | € 665.000 € 625.000 | -6.0% | 113 m²135 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Johan Watelerpad 14
Detached at Johan Watelerpad 14 in 's-Gravenhage (Ockenburgh neighbourhood). The home was built in 1998 and has 264 m² of living space, a 1,967 m² plot, 4 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (6.1 km). The nearest primary school is De Kleine Keizer (966 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted13 Jun 2026€ 1,995,000−€ 255,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 2,250,000
Property details
- Living area
- 264 m²
- Plot
- 1967 m²
- Construction year
- 1998
- Property type
- Detached
- Bedrooms
- 4
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 1,930,000
- Ownership
- Freehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Ockenburgh, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energyⓘ
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High2.9%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Glass horticulture area within 1 kmⓘ
- Very many glasshouses (strong light nuisance)62,090 m²
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Distance to interchange stationⓘ
- Far away8.4 km
- General practitioners within 1 kmⓘ
- No GP within 1 km0
- Crimes per 1,000 residentsⓘ
- High crime132.3 per 1,000 residents
- Max. flood depth (LIWO)ⓘ
- Deep (0.5–2 m)1.4 m
- Building coverage percentageⓘ
- Plenty of open land17%
- Zoning purpose (main category)ⓘ
- Residential designationresidential
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Unbuilt plot areaⓘ
- Very spacious plot1,639 m²
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average35%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space310 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)ⓘ
- Efficient (label A/B)175 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy labelⓘ
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical650 m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
3 permits within 500 m · 16 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
88th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 58 pupils · total 692 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 462 pupils
Disadvantage score 149 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
53rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 27 pupils · total 224 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
74th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
31st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
63rd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 96 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.