Price drops in and around Den Haag
More homes in and around Den Haag whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
John Rädeckerkade 51
Apartment at John Rädeckerkade 51 in 's-Gravenhage (Houtwijk neighbourhood). The home was built in 1983 and has 83 m² of living space and 2 bedrooms. The nearest railway station is Den Haag Moerwijk (4.2 km). The nearest primary school is Openbare basisschool Houtwijk (207 m).
Price & status history
- Price reduced25 Jun 2026€ 330,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 350,000
Property details
- Living area
- 83 m²
- Construction year
- 1983
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- —
- WOZ value
- € 305,000
- Ownership
- —
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Houtwijk, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.4%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High2.9%
- PFAS measurement above norm (closest)
- Above the standardYes
- Number of building plans within 500 m
- Much building activity55
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away6.2 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated205 persons
- Children per primary school place (proxy)
- Many children per place2.94 ratio
- Physical limitations (neighbourhood)
- high share19.7%
- Obesity (neighbourhood)
- High16.1%
- Score nearest primary school (percentile)
- Low (bottom quarter)12%
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,573 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical710 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values6.8%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.836 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away43 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)46.7 km
- Distance nearest E-PRTR facility
- Well away (>2 km)3.7 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
23 permits · 55 construction plans within 500 m · 17 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
12th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 249 pupils
Disadvantage score 84 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
45th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 34 — more disadvantage than 75% of schools
9th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 159 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
49th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 303 pupils
Disadvantage score 26 — more disadvantage than 67% of schools
64th percentile — average · ROUTE 8 · grade 8: 21 pupils · total 224 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
65th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 59 pupils · total 509 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 44% of schools
85th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 164 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 70% of schools
98th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 25 pupils · total 223 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
30th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 15 pupils · total 130 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 84% of schools
35th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 47 pupils · total 450 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
13th percentile — low · 87% passed · CE avg 6.2 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 102 exam candidates
52nd percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 123 exam candidates
3rd percentile — low · 78% passed · CE avg 6.1 · HAVO/VWO · 157 exam candidates
73rd percentile — average · 96% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 54 exam candidates
74th percentile — average · 100% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 66 exam candidates
31st percentile — average · 87% passed · CE avg 6.4 · HAVO/VWO · 165 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
74th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO/MAVO · 99 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.