Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
| When | Address | Price | Δ% | Size | Verdict | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
20/07/2026 | Herenstraat 25 Weesp | € 860.000 € 840.000 | -2.3% | 135 m²97 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Van der Helstplein 10 1 Amsterdam | € 620.000 € 595.000 | -4.0% | 63 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Binnen Brouwersstraat 44 Amsterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.199.000 | -4.1% | 106 m²23 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Loenermark 384 Amsterdam | € 40.000 € 35.000 | -12.5% | — | |||
20/07/2026 | Rode Zee 31 Zaandam | € 450.000 € 375.000 | -16.7% | 125 m²121 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Knokkestraat 65 Amsterdam | € 619.100 € 619.000 | -0.0% | 125 m²62 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Parosstraat 6 Amsterdam | € 1.695.000 € 1.495.000 | -11.8% | 258 m²385 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Willem de Zwijgerlaan 334 C14 Amsterdam | € 350.000 € 335.000 | -4.3% | 51 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Banne Buikslootlaan 125 Amsterdam | € 425.000 € 400.000 | -5.9% | 61 m² | |||
20/07/2026 | Oeverpad 191 Amsterdam | € 585.000 € 550.000 | -6.0% | 122 m² | |||
19/07/2026 | Paulus Potterstraat 24 A Amsterdam | € 4.000.000 € 3.950.000 | -1.3% | 238 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Cornelis Vermuydenstraat 92 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 65 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Surinameplein 10 H Amsterdam | € 1.265.000 € 1.095.000 | -13.4% | 171 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Sibogastraat 93 Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 450.000 | -10.0% | 63 m² | |||
18/07/2026 | Tweede Boerhaavestraat 70 1 Amsterdam | € 550.000 € 525.000 | -4.5% | 62 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Kloveniersburgwal 99 F Amsterdam | € 695.000 € 675.000 | -2.9% | 74 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Ceintuurbaan 167 3 Amsterdam | € 1.250.000 € 1.245.000 | -0.4% | 149 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Olof Palmeplein 55 Amsterdam | € 400.000 € 395.000 | -1.3% | 76 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Leerdamhof 7 Amsterdam | € 450.000 € 375.000 | -16.7% | 74 m² | |||
17/07/2026 | Egelantiersstraat 122 D Amsterdam | € 500.000 € 485.000 | -3.0% | 62 m² |
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Joseph Scaligerstraat 26
Semi-detached at Joseph Scaligerstraat 26 in Amsterdam (Jacob Geelbuurt neighbourhood). The home was built in 1956 and has 70 m² of living space, a 73 m² plot, 2 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Amsterdam Lelylaan (512 m). The nearest primary school is Brede School Huizinga (199 m).
Price & status history
- Sold (conditional)16 Jul 2026
- Relisted25 Jun 2026€ 485,000−€ 20,000
- Listed for sale3 Jun 2026€ 505,000
Property details
- Living area
- 70 m²
- Plot
- 73 m²
- Construction year
- 1956
- Property type
- Semi-detached
- Bedrooms
- 2
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 510,000
- Ownership
- Property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Jacob Geelbuurt, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissionsⓘ
- High emissions2,795 kg/m2/yr
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)ⓘ
- Much neighbour nuisance11.5%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)ⓘ
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)ⓘ
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny dayⓘ
- Extreme heat stress46 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 kmⓘ
- Heavy industry nearby13
- Heat stress classⓘ
- Extreme heat stress (level 2)extreem_2
- Can find cooling outside the homeⓘ
- Few people find cooling outside34.4%
- Able to find cooling in the propertyⓘ
- Few people can cool off indoors32.3%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)ⓘ
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Shared plotⓘ
- Own plotNo
- Building statusⓘ
- In useBuilding in use
- Share of homes with solar powerⓘ
- Above average26%
- Usable roof area for solar panelsⓘ
- Ample roof space49 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumptionⓘ
- Economical430 m³
- Solar potential roofⓘ
- Strong potential3,439 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWpⓘ
- Excellent yield1,002 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)ⓘ
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 kmⓘ
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂ⓘ
- Very low0.669 µg/m³
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
10 permits within 500 m · 37 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
6th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 292 pupils
Disadvantage score 57 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
22nd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 65 pupils · total 471 pupils
Disadvantage score 16 — more disadvantage than 53% of schools
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
3rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 161 pupils
Disadvantage score 58 — more disadvantage than 89% of schools
15th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 45 pupils · total 338 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
59th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 667 pupils
Disadvantage score 52 — more disadvantage than 86% of schools
34th percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 54 pupils · total 489 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
12th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 9 pupils · total 73 pupils
Disadvantage score 23 — more disadvantage than 63% of schools
71st percentile — average · IEP · grade 8: 30 pupils · total 250 pupils
Disadvantage score 6 — more disadvantage than 31% of schools
87th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 71 pupils · total 533 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
35th percentile — average · 93% passed · CE avg 6.3 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO/PRO · 93 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 231 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.