Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kempenlaan 61
Terraced house at Kempenlaan 61 in Amsterdam (Belgiëplein e.o. neighbourhood). The home was built in 1994 and has 88 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label B. The nearest railway station is Henk Sneevlietweg (1.8 km). The nearest primary school is Basisschool de Mijlpaal (250 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted2 Jul 2026€ 495,000−€ 34,000
- Listed for sale27 May 2026€ 529,000
Property details
- Living area
- 88 m²
- Plot
- —
- Construction year
- 1994
- Property type
- Terraced house
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- B
- WOZ value
- € 496,000
- Ownership
- Municipal leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Belgiëplein e.o., compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Share of renewable energy
- Low share renewable0%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Apparent temperature on a sunny day
- Extreme heat stress44 °C
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby7
- Heat stress class
- Extreme heat stress (level 1)extreem_1
- Distance to interchange station
- Far away5.7 km
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated125 persons
- Satisfied with the residential environment (neighbourhood)
- Bottom 25% (lowest satisfaction)86.8%
- Permits <500 m (12 months)
- Much building pressure6
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot1,833 m²
- Usable roof area for solar panels
- Ample roof space83 m²
- Energy index (primary fossil)
- Efficient (label A/B)184 kWh/m²/yr
- Energy label
- EconomicalB
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical620 m³
- Solar potential roof
- Very high potential6,699 kWh/yr
- Solar output per kWp
- Excellent yield1,004 kWh/kWp/yr
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
6 permits within 500 m · 26 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
44th percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 41 pupils · total 352 pupils
Disadvantage score 10 — more disadvantage than 42% of schools
51st percentile — average · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 403 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
8th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 48 pupils · total 299 pupils
Disadvantage score 2 — more disadvantage than 16% of schools
23rd percentile — low · DIA · grade 8: 46 pupils · total 341 pupils
Disadvantage score 1 — more disadvantage than 8% of schools
64th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 241 pupils
Disadvantage score 14 — more disadvantage than 50% of schools
17th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 244 pupils
Disadvantage score 38 — more disadvantage than 78% of schools
43rd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 44 pupils · total 513 pupils
Disadvantage score 71 — more disadvantage than 93% of schools
83rd percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 425 pupils
No measured educational disadvantage
3rd percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 16 pupils · total 203 pupils
Disadvantage score 46 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
18th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 64 pupils · total 422 pupils
Disadvantage score 33 — more disadvantage than 74% of schools
3rd percentile — low · 75% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 299 exam candidates
78th percentile — high · 98% passed · CE avg 6.5 · VBO · 58 exam candidates
66th percentile — average · 97% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO · 68 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 231 exam candidates
56th percentile — average · 94% passed · CE avg 6.4 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 97 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO
5th percentile — low · 84% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 138 exam candidates
72nd percentile — average · 95% passed · CE avg 6.6 · VBO · 38 exam candidates
no exam results · MAVO/HAVO
0th percentile — low · 59% passed · CE avg 5.6 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 29 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.