Price drops in and around Amsterdam
More homes in and around Amsterdam whose asking price was recently cut.
BETA: Below are risk factors that can negatively affect this home's value. Note: the data below may be incomplete (some homes are missing data), may contain errors and is not always up to date. Points of interest in the neighbourhood may be missing or incorrect. The figures and estimates are indicative and open to interpretation. No rights can be derived from them. Always do your own research.
Kikkenstein 2928
Apartment at Kikkenstein 2928 in Amsterdam (Bijlmermuseum-Zuid neighbourhood). The home was built in 1970 and has 93 m² of living space, 3 bedrooms and energy label D. The nearest railway station is Kraaiennest (417 m). The nearest primary school is IKC Nelson Mandela (237 m).
Price & status history
- Relisted12 Jun 2026€ 320,000−€ 15,000
- Listed for sale2 Jun 2026€ 335,000
Property details
- Living area
- 93 m²
- Construction year
- 1970
- Property type
- Apartment
- Bedrooms
- 3
- Energy label
- D
- WOZ value
- € 371,000
- Ownership
- Municipal property encumbered with leasehold
- Estate agent
- —
Age composition of the neighbourhood
Share of residents per age group in Bijlmermuseum-Zuid, compared with the Dutch average. Source: CBS.
Features
- Calculated CO₂ emissions
- High emissions8,482 kg/m2/yr
- Serious noise nuisance from neighbours (neighbourhood)
- Much neighbour nuisance10%
- Odour nuisance sewerage/water treatment (% seriously bothered)
- High2.1%
- Odour nuisance from road traffic (% seriously affected)
- High3.2%
- Large industrial businesses within 5 km
- Heavy industry nearby6
- Can find cooling outside the home
- Few people find cooling outside37.8%
- Able to find cooling in the property
- Few people can cool off indoors37.6%
- Aircraft movements per hour (nearest airport)
- Very busy54.1 per hour
- Share of persons in poverty
- High poverty10.3%
- Residents in 100m grid cell
- Very densely populated130 persons
- Zoning purpose (main category)
- Residential designationresidential
- Leasehold or freehold
- FreeholdNo
- Building status
- In useBuilding in use
- Plot area (cadastral plot)
- Very generous plot2,590 m²
- Avg. natural gas consumption
- Economical60 m³
- WOZ value year-on-year change (municipality)
- Rising property values11%
- Number of hazardous businesses within 1 km
- None in the neighbourhood0
- Background concentration SO₂
- Very low0.572 µg/m³
- Distance to waste incineration facility
- Far away15.4 km
- Distance to biomass plant
- At distance (>3 km)12.8 km
Stations
Construction plans & permits in the neighbourhood
Tap a category to show or hide it.
8 permits within 500 m · 20 zoning plan amendments within 5 km. Click the map for each permit’s description.
Schools
52nd percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 18 pupils · total 188 pupils
Disadvantage score 75 — more disadvantage than 94% of schools
14th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 28 pupils · total 211 pupils
Disadvantage score 88 — more disadvantage than 96% of schools
3rd percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 37 pupils · total 331 pupils
Disadvantage score 114 — more disadvantage than 99% of schools
21st percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 62 pupils · total 511 pupils
Disadvantage score 168 — more disadvantage than 100% of schools
10th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 269 pupils
Disadvantage score 40 — more disadvantage than 79% of schools
19th percentile — low · IEP · grade 8: 43 pupils · total 454 pupils
Disadvantage score 48 — more disadvantage than 83% of schools
6th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 26 pupils · total 179 pupils
Disadvantage score 77 — more disadvantage than 95% of schools
44th percentile — average · LIB · grade 8: 35 pupils · total 264 pupils
Disadvantage score 28 — more disadvantage than 69% of schools
77th percentile — high · LIB · grade 8: 38 pupils · total 227 pupils
Disadvantage score 64 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
5th percentile — low · LIB · grade 8: 20 pupils · total 253 pupils
Disadvantage score 65 — more disadvantage than 91% of schools
4th percentile — low · 81% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 282 exam candidates
2nd percentile — low · 79% passed · CE avg 5.8 · VBO/MAVO · 33 exam candidates
no exam results · HAVO/VWO
25th percentile — low · 95% passed · CE avg 6.1 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO · 38 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 69% passed · CE avg 5.9 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 118 exam candidates
no exam results · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO
no exam results · PRO
6th percentile — low · 86% passed · CE avg 6.0 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 7 exam candidates
1st percentile — low · 72% passed · CE avg 5.9 · MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 158 exam candidates
39th percentile — average · 90% passed · CE avg 6.4 · VBO/MAVO/HAVO/VWO · 271 exam candidates
Source: DUO Open Education Data · raw figures, not adjusted for the pupil population.